The disclosures from Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard about the coordinated efforts of the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Barack Obama administration, and prior intelligence agencies to frame Donald Trump as a Russian stooge is a huge story that the mainstream media has blacked out.
Instead, they continue to focus on the Epstein files, in which they had little interest during the Biden administration. Now, we will be the first to admit that Trump has made the matter worse for himself by continuing to comment on it and making it look like he has something to hide. But we’re fairly certain that if there was something incriminating about Trump in these files, it would’ve been leaked during the Biden administration, just as his tax returns were.
If there were other people who were trafficking underage children in that time who have not yet been brought to justice, then by all means, let’s find them. But we saw no evidence of that in either this or the prior administration.
Meanwhile, one of the biggest scandals in American history has been uncovered over the last couple of weeks regarding Hillary Clinton‘s now proven attempt to deflect attention from her email scandal by concocting a story that Trump was a Russian stooge as supposedly evidenced by a phony dossier.
We’re not saying that readers have to buy hook, line and sinker everything in the Gabbard and Grassley reports but they at least have a right to see the details. Folks shouldn’t have to go to Newsmax or Fox to find it.
To recap, this is how the scandal developed:
1.Hillary Clinton and her campaign wanted to deflect attention from her email scandal so they manufactured a story that Donald Trump was in cahoots with the Russians to get him elected.
2. Disclosed emails now prove that U.S. intelligence agents were aware as early as the summer of 2016 of this plot and that there was no evidence to suggest Trump was colluding with the Russians.
3. Nevertheless, the FBI deliberately failed to investigate Clinton over the chicanery and, instead, used the false information to begin a spying operation on candidate Trump, whom they loathed and feared could win the presidency.
4. So the irony is that, while there was no actual collusion between Trump and the Russians as the Clinton campaign, the intelligence community and the media claimed, there was, in fact, collusion between the Clinton campaign and the intelligence community to shield Clinton and destroy Trump. And the media gleefully played along, in some cases garnering Pulitzer Prizes for their inaccurate reporting.
5. Rank-and-file career intelligence officials pushed back against the CIA hierarchy to warn that the claims of collusion, Russian voter hacking and Russia trying to help Trump were unsupportable by the evidence and should not be included in any CIA briefings, reports or petitions for judicial intervention.
6. Those warnings were dismissed by CIA chief John Brennan, who insisted they be included in the briefings and internal reports in order to justify spying against Trump. The rationale he used is that even though there might be no evidence, he declared, “doesn’t it ring true?”
This is clear evidence of a conspiracy to use false information to help Clinton and to hurt Trump.
7. The FBI used this false information to spy on Trump as well.
An FBI lawyer lied to the FISA court by claiming that Trump ally Carter Page had never been a cooperating Informant for the CIA when, in fact, he had been. The lie was perpetrated because telling the truth in the application would’ve led to a denial of the warrant to spy on him and the Trump campaign.
FBI Director James Comey, who detested Trump, allowed the false dossier claim that the Russians had incriminating information on Trump — including an unsupportable claim that there was a tape of him urinating on prostitutes in Moscow — to be used on three occasions before the court to continue the spying warrant.
8. Clinton’s allies in the Democratic Party, including then-Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California), promoted lies to the public that there was definitive evidence proving Trump-Russia collusion.
9. The intelligence community allowed the lie to perpetuate and the media pushed the narrative for years until even the Democratically stacked Mueller Commission had to concede there was no collusion.
10. The false narrative of the concocted smears by the Clinton campaign led to over half of the nation believing the lie.
In summary:
- The Clinton campaign created the lie that Trump was colluding with the Russians.
- The intelligence agencies refused to investigate Clinton for concocting the lies and instead lied to the courts and the public about the false story.
- The media spread the lie.
- The public believed the lie.
- And now the media that was complicit in that lie are seeking to bury the real story because it implicates their role in spreading it.